View previous topic | View next topic |
Author |
Message |
*rotkwicca*
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 1705
|
Posted: Sat, 24-Feb-2007 20:56 Post subject: COP for dummies :D |
|
|
I thought of starting a topic like this for those who are only RG fans to ask their "stupid" questions about the code of points and so that more experienced and involved people can perhaps demistify some parts of RG scoring
Here you can also ask all sorts of small questions about COP, the elements (values, names, etc) and anything else without hesitation, and to hope that some that are more experts in this field will be kind enough to sort out your dillemas
I have first a question, can somebody briefly explain to me the basic differences between the pre-2001 COP and post-2001 COP, and what were the changes in 2005 COP?
Thanks very much in advance _________________ One and only...Marina Shpekht!
http://marinashpekht.page.tl/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
OOTCHY
Joined: 18 Feb 2007 Posts: 1055
|
Posted: Thu, 1-Mar-2007 19:16 Post subject: |
|
|
ok, i want to ask 2 stupid questions;
1= what are the changes in the TV did any changes happend or changed
if yes ,then what are those changes cause i only see changes in the artistry
2= are there any new regulations or changes in the execution
cause it very hard for me to read all that are placed in this forum about the cop , i want just a summary for the new changes |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marie
Joined: 26 Oct 2003 Posts: 1293
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marie
Joined: 26 Oct 2003 Posts: 1293
|
Posted: Thu, 1-Mar-2007 20:26 Post subject: |
|
|
OOTCHY wrote: | ok, i want to ask 2 stupid questions;
1= what are the changes in the TV did any changes happend or changed
if yes ,then what are those changes cause i only see changes in the artistry
2= are there any new regulations or changes in the execution
cause it very hard for me to read all that are placed in this forum about the cop , i want just a summary for the new changes |
From 2006 to 2007, nothing changed in the execution.
Very little changed in the Difficulty (TV) value, except that the FIG now has set a tolerance of 20 degrees when validating the difficulty. For example, a split leap of (180 minus max. 20 =) min. 160 degrees is valid as a difficulty, but with an execution deduction if the split is not min. 180 degrees. And as happens a lot throughtout the years, a couple of new difficulties have been added. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
OOTCHY
Joined: 18 Feb 2007 Posts: 1055
|
Posted: Thu, 1-Mar-2007 23:02 Post subject: |
|
|
shall i find these difficulties in the NLS ...sorry marieMM i didnt understand the part of the split leap Quote: | a split leap of (180 minus max. 20 =) min. 160 degrees is valid as a difficulty, |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sery
Joined: 26 Oct 2003 Posts: 497
|
Posted: Fri, 2-Mar-2007 3:35 Post subject: |
|
|
OOTCHY wrote: | shall i find these difficulties in the NLS ...sorry marieMM i didnt understand the part of the split leap Quote: | a split leap of (180 minus max. 20 =) min. 160 degrees is valid as a difficulty, |
|
Marie explained that for Difficulty absence of amplitude is acceptable if it's within -20 degrees (160 degrees of split in stead of 180).
see the COP, for example:
Pour les pivots en grand écart avec tronc à l’horizontale, le tronc doit garder nettement la position horizontale pour toute la rotation. Une tolérance de 20° est tolérée.
I was said that Madamme did a presentation about the 20 degrees tolerance at World Cup Final and Asian Games. _________________ Go Alina, you are the Olympic Champion 2008!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jana
Joined: 16 Jul 2005 Posts: 252 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Fri, 2-Mar-2007 9:07 Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Very little changed in the Difficulty (TV) value, except that the FIG now has set a tolerance of 20 degrees when validating the difficulty. For example, a split leap of (180 minus max. 20 =) min. 160 degrees is valid as a difficulty |
funny for me, because this rule was made for B-level gymnasts in Germany the last years too.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anna Kull
Joined: 27 Oct 2003 Posts: 5153 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Fri, 2-Mar-2007 9:11 Post subject: |
|
|
[quote]Quote:
Very little changed in the Difficulty (TV) value, except that the FIG now has set a tolerance of 20 degrees when validating the difficulty. For example, a split leap of (180 minus max. 20 =) min. 160 degrees is valid as a difficulty
This is a shame because it makes people getting nasty in Execution IMO. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jana
Joined: 16 Jul 2005 Posts: 252 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Fri, 2-Mar-2007 9:19 Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, I think the new rule has advantages and disadvantages
......for A-level gymnasts its a little bit senseless cause they all have the great flexibility you need for such elements...
but: for some gymnasts its nicer if the judges are more tolerable.....e.g. they do a split standing with 170°....it´s nice to watch too and they get the difficulty points and a dedection in execution....over this its nice that some girls who aren´t that overoveroverflexible get some points more cause in the past they were disadvantaged |
|
Back to top |
|
|
OOTCHY
Joined: 18 Feb 2007 Posts: 1055
|
Posted: Fri, 2-Mar-2007 12:56 Post subject: |
|
|
Sery wrote: | OOTCHY wrote: | shall i find these difficulties in the NLS ...sorry marieMM i didnt understand the part of the split leap Quote: | a split leap of (180 minus max. 20 =) min. 160 degrees is valid as a difficulty, |
|
Marie explained that for Difficulty absence of amplitude is acceptable if it's within -20 degrees (160 degrees of split in stead of 180).
I was said that Madamme did a presentation about the 20 degrees tolerance at World Cup Final and Asian Games. |
thank you sery for your explanation |
|
Back to top |
|
|
*rotkwicca*
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 1705
|
Posted: Fri, 2-Mar-2007 19:13 Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for links [/code] _________________ One and only...Marina Shpekht!
http://marinashpekht.page.tl/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
maii
Joined: 20 Jul 2005 Posts: 1011 Location: The Netherlands..
|
Posted: Mon, 5-Mar-2007 18:40 Post subject: |
|
|
Love this topic! It's was great idea starting one! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
*rotkwicca*
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 1705
|
Posted: Mon, 5-Mar-2007 18:58 Post subject: |
|
|
I have a question, from which score do you deduce score when there is no choreography, music is used as backgroun and there is a favourized group of elements that dominates? Also a question, if a gymnast for example had far too many cossack elements or backscale elements she gets deduction right? _________________ One and only...Marina Shpekht!
http://marinashpekht.page.tl/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kaja =)
Joined: 06 May 2004 Posts: 5421 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Mon, 5-Mar-2007 20:12 Post subject: |
|
|
*rotkwicca* wrote: | I have a question, from which score do you deduce score when there is no choreography, music is used as backgroun and there is a favourized group of elements that dominates? |
None No, to be honest, it's in Artistry, at least the part about background music.
Quote: | Also a question, if a gymnast for example had far too many cossack elements or backscale elements she gets deduction right? |
I didn't know that a specific rule existed for this (I mean I know you can't do two identical elements but I didn't know there was a rule against doing cossack balance, cossack balance tourlant, cossack with raised leg, 720' cossack pivot, 1080' cossack pivot in the same routine to take an example). Anyway if there is such a rule I dare say it only applies for some _________________ And those who danced were thought to be quite insane by those who could not hear the music |
|
Back to top |
|
|
*rotkwicca*
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 1705
|
Posted: Tue, 6-Mar-2007 0:44 Post subject: |
|
|
I read in some routine analysis of Kapranova that someone did, the person who was analyising said he would give a deduction for her for using to many backscale elements, and not using the carpet effectively or something like that. I can't remember for sure that's why i made this topic in the first place _________________ One and only...Marina Shpekht!
http://marinashpekht.page.tl/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|