View previous topic | View next topic |
Author |
Message |
*Kalinka*
Joined: 09 Apr 2009 Posts: 2180 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Thu, 4-Aug-2011 16:16 Post subject: |
|
|
clinneyrsg wrote: | Hi! My question: Somebody told me that if you catch the ball after a risk with both hands it won´t be counted. Is this correct? If yes, so would it be possible to catch the ball after a risk this way?: (0:55) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAldaMnbHcA
|
I think Trofimova planned to catch the ball with the back of her hands, not with two hands. Anyway, if a gymnast catches the ball (or any other apparatus) with two hands after a risk, the risk is counted. But value of the risk is reduced of 0.10. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
clinneyrsg
Joined: 09 May 2011 Posts: 106 Location: On the carpet
|
Posted: Thu, 4-Aug-2011 19:04 Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you Kalinka!!!!! Well and if I catch the ball with the back of the hands, the way Ulyana did it, will the value be reduced then of 0,10 too? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
*Kalinka*
Joined: 09 Apr 2009 Posts: 2180 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Thu, 4-Aug-2011 19:25 Post subject: |
|
|
The catch of the ball with the back of the hands is a bonus of 0.10. So if you write on your sheet that you will perform a catch with the back of the hands you'll get a bonus, and of course the value of the risk won't be reduced. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
clinneyrsg
Joined: 09 May 2011 Posts: 106 Location: On the carpet
|
Posted: Thu, 4-Aug-2011 19:56 Post subject: |
|
|
Oh
Thank you very much for your reply Kalinka!!!
Btw, great new avatar!! ) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
*Kalinka*
Joined: 09 Apr 2009 Posts: 2180 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Thu, 4-Aug-2011 21:29 Post subject: |
|
|
clinneyrsg wrote: | Oh
Thank you very much for your reply Kalinka!!!
Btw, great new avatar!! ) |
You are welcome!
Thanks, I also love this photo! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tahnee RSG.net Moderator
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 3296 Location: Perth, Australia
|
Posted: Fri, 5-Aug-2011 0:06 Post subject: |
|
|
You are also allowed to catch with 2 hands if it is without sight (eg. behind the neck in an illusion). _________________ http://www.youtube.com/Tahnee2612 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
clinneyrsg
Joined: 09 May 2011 Posts: 106 Location: On the carpet
|
Posted: Fri, 5-Aug-2011 7:29 Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you Tahnee . I just already have such a catch (and also a catch with the legs) in the routine, so I didn´t won´t to repeat it. Thank you for help! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yussupovafan
Joined: 10 Mar 2009 Posts: 586
|
Posted: Fri, 22-Jun-2012 6:48 Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
Could anyone please explain to me which part of Mazur first pivot at 0.23 is consider to be connected with mastery of apparatus?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-2DcmrsADg
Thank in advance! _________________ Filiou, Phazava, Nichol, Rodriguez - smaller federation, bigger performance!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tahnee RSG.net Moderator
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 3296 Location: Perth, Australia
|
Posted: Fri, 22-Jun-2012 9:19 Post subject: |
|
|
yussupovafan wrote: | Hi,
Could anyone please explain to me which part of Mazur first pivot at 0.23 is consider to be connected with mastery of apparatus?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-2DcmrsADg
Thank in advance! |
This is written as an unstable balance. Balanced ball like so is unstable during pivot elements. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/Tahnee2612 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|