Contents Information Events and Results Gymnasts Archive
Contents Archive Archive

Message board

Welcome to the new RSG.net message board! Please behave!
Please remember, that the message board is not responsible for the opinions expressed by its members.
Also don't insult, blame, accuse, discriminate, or debase other people here.
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Combinations in flexibilities

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Rhythmic Gymnastics Forum Index » Code of Points
View previous topic | View next topic  
Author Message
Eulucil



Joined: 11 Sep 2008
Posts: 524
Location: Spain

PostPosted: Fri, 12-Sep-2008 1:57    Post subject: Combinations in flexibilities Reply with quote

I have seen a lot of times combination of flexibilities that seem to count as one single element. For example, a ronde+back scale, or a backscale pivot, then they go to ring position (for example Kanaeva). Which are the rules to combinate the flexibilities this way? Will it be allowed with the new code? I would like to know everything regarding this kind of combinations.

http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdDIXU_BRAk For example, at 01:10

http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=pD7sQf0gO4U 00:31
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AnnaBessonovaNumber1Fan



Joined: 26 Jan 2008
Posts: 1609
Location: England

PostPosted: Fri, 12-Sep-2008 7:30    Post subject: Reply with quote

I dont know the answer to your question, I just watched the videos you sent the links to... Kanaevas shouldnt count Shocked She lowered her relevae in the backscale pivot, and almost fell out. Then she jumped into the straight ring balance Confused
_________________
Anna's The Real Olympic Champion!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Eulucil



Joined: 11 Sep 2008
Posts: 524
Location: Spain

PostPosted: Fri, 12-Sep-2008 10:21    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry if the elements are not the best executed, but they were the firsts I found when I was posting, and the quality of the video is good. It's more a difficulty question, how they write these elements in their DV.

Thank you for the replies!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tahnee
RSG.net Moderator
RSG.net Moderator


Joined: 11 Jan 2004
Posts: 3296
Location: Perth, Australia

PostPosted: Sat, 13-Sep-2008 23:55    Post subject: Reply with quote

They can only count as one if they are either stated in the COP as being a single difficulty (eg. back balance to back scale, or the same plus return to back balance), or approved/being approved as an originality.

Otherwise, they are separate difficulties just performed in combination (usually to save time in the routine).
_________________
http://www.youtube.com/Tahnee2612
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Eulucil



Joined: 11 Sep 2008
Posts: 524
Location: Spain

PostPosted: Sun, 14-Sep-2008 0:44    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tahnee wrote:
They can only count as one if they are either stated in the COP as being a single difficulty (eg. back balance to back scale, or the same plus return to back balance), or approved/being approved as an originality.

Otherwise, they are separate difficulties just performed in combination (usually to save time in the routine).


Thank you Bounce !! Is better this way, because we won't see the same body moves written as different difficulties (back scale pivot, back scale pivot + ring balance, back scale pivot + ring balance + back scale... Cool )
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
CoCoNuTsiopatHic



Joined: 14 Apr 2006
Posts: 819

PostPosted: Thu, 18-Sep-2008 21:06    Post subject: Re: Combinations in flexibilities Reply with quote

Eulucil wrote:
I have seen a lot of times combination of flexibilities that seem to count as one single element. For example, a ronde+back scale, or a backscale pivot, then they go to ring position


Neither of those two specific examples actually count as one difficulty, though Kanaeva's variation on the Utyasheva with the Back Scale 1/2 Turn in the middle was accepted as a single difficulty.
_________________
*Elegance is an attitude.*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Rhythmic Gymnastics Forum Index » Code of Points All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Contents | Information | Events and Results | Gymnasts | Archive

last Modified: 25. October 2003

Copyright © 1996-2004 Alexander Kochanntrilobit GmbH
trilobit