View previous topic | View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Tahnee RSG.net Moderator
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 3296 Location: Perth, Australia
|
Posted: Sun, 8-Feb-2009 7:19 Post subject: |
|
|
grga wrote: | Hi when doing a log roll ,if i want to roll the ball does it have to roll twice??
thanks |
A log roll? Do you mean a split roll?
And do you mean to claim a series of rolls do you have it to roll it twice? _________________ http://www.youtube.com/Tahnee2612 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tahnee RSG.net Moderator
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 3296 Location: Perth, Australia
|
Posted: Tue, 17-Feb-2009 7:58 Post subject: |
|
|
Do you reckon you can claim a change of direction in bounces? I've just been writing out my new routine and I sat and thought about this for awhile. I mean, it seems obvious that the ball must change direction in bounces, and that you could therefore claim every time you bounce, but there is nothing in the COP that says you cannot write it on your sheet. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/Tahnee2612 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jana
Joined: 16 Jul 2005 Posts: 252 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Tue, 17-Feb-2009 18:15 Post subject: |
|
|
You can only add the "change of direction symbol" to bouncing when the rhythmus or the level is changing (e.g. high, low bouncing) or when the gymnast do a rotation of herself. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CoCoNuTsiopatHic
Joined: 14 Apr 2006 Posts: 819
|
Posted: Tue, 17-Feb-2009 19:29 Post subject: |
|
|
Tahnee wrote: | Do you reckon you can claim a change of direction in bounces? I've just been writing out my new routine and I sat and thought about this for awhile. I mean, it seems obvious that the ball must change direction in bounces, and that you could therefore claim every time you bounce, but there is nothing in the COP that says you cannot write it on your sheet. |
Heh, nah, I don't think that'd work. The change in direction or rhythm, etc. has to be demonstrated from one bounce to another. _________________ *Elegance is an attitude.* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tahnee RSG.net Moderator
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 3296 Location: Perth, Australia
|
Posted: Tue, 17-Feb-2009 23:28 Post subject: |
|
|
CoCoNuTsiopatHic wrote: | Tahnee wrote: | Do you reckon you can claim a change of direction in bounces? I've just been writing out my new routine and I sat and thought about this for awhile. I mean, it seems obvious that the ball must change direction in bounces, and that you could therefore claim every time you bounce, but there is nothing in the COP that says you cannot write it on your sheet. |
Heh, nah, I don't think that'd work. The change in direction or rhythm, etc. has to be demonstrated from one bounce to another. |
Haha, oh well. Technically, it is changing direction, and you only have to do one bounce - but yes, I can see I'm doing a bit of wishful thinking here.. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/Tahnee2612 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Anyen93
Joined: 29 Feb 2008 Posts: 707 Location: Prague,CZE
|
Posted: Thu, 19-Feb-2009 17:46 Post subject: |
|
|
If I do figure eight during difficulity movement(wave), can I count it as technical movement? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pulsatilla
Joined: 06 Aug 2007 Posts: 26
|
Posted: Fri, 27-Feb-2009 13:00 Post subject: what kind of maestry are these? |
|
|
I need help to undestand what kind of maestry are these showed by Charkashina's ball routine in LA Tournament. According to what I undestood these three difficulties shouldn't be valid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQXk7T_mQnM&feature=related
Take a look at 0.45, at 1.05 (apart from clearly grasped ball) and 1.29!
Thank you. _________________ PULSATILLA |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attitude
Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 103
|
Posted: Fri, 27-Feb-2009 16:10 Post subject: Re: what kind of maestry are these? |
|
|
pulsatilla wrote: | I need help to undestand what kind of maestry are these showed by Charkashina's ball routine in LA Tournament. According to what I undestood these three difficulties shouldn't be valid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQXk7T_mQnM&feature=related
Take a look at 0.45, at 1.05 (apart from clearly grasped ball) and 1.29!
Thank you. |
To my point of view she does not show any mastery in connection with those body difficulties
at 1:29 perhaps she had not enough time to do her mastery (perhaps throw ?) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
grga
Joined: 08 Oct 2007 Posts: 33 Location: Gibraltar
|
Posted: Fri, 27-Feb-2009 21:41 Post subject: |
|
|
Posted: Sun, 8-Feb-2009 7:19 Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
grga wrote:
Hi when doing a log roll ,if i want to roll the ball does it have to roll twice??
thanks
A log roll? Do you mean a split roll?
And do you mean to claim a series of rolls do you have it to roll it twice
sorry yes a split roll , if the ball rolls on the floor is that enough??
Thanks
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tahnee RSG.net Moderator
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 3296 Location: Perth, Australia
|
Posted: Fri, 27-Feb-2009 23:23 Post subject: |
|
|
grga wrote: | Posted: Sun, 8-Feb-2009 7:19 Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
grga wrote:
Hi when doing a log roll ,if i want to roll the ball does it have to roll twice??
thanks
A log roll? Do you mean a split roll?
And do you mean to claim a series of rolls do you have it to roll it twice
sorry yes a split roll , if the ball rolls on the floor is that enough??
Thanks
|
From what I know, you must do three small rolls on the floor during the split roll to count as handling. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/Tahnee2612 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CoCoNuTsiopatHic
Joined: 14 Apr 2006 Posts: 819
|
Posted: Sat, 28-Feb-2009 1:07 Post subject: |
|
|
Tahnee wrote: |
From what I know, you must do three small rolls on the floor during the split roll to count as handling. |
That was my understanding too based on the CoP--that for small rolls, rolls on the floor, and accompanied rolls to count as Mastery that they have to be performed in a series, but from what we've seen from competition videos thus far it does look like gymnasts are performing all of these little rolls in isolation, or in a sequence of 2 instead of 3. So... Not sure what to think. _________________ *Elegance is an attitude.* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attitude
Joined: 22 Apr 2006 Posts: 103
|
Posted: Sat, 28-Feb-2009 13:57 Post subject: |
|
|
I totally agree with you
they have to be in serie or you have to do a long roll over 2 segments
and I also recognized, that in several routines we just could see one or two small rolls for mastery |
|
Back to top |
|
|
OOTCHY
Joined: 18 Feb 2007 Posts: 1055
|
Posted: Fri, 6-Mar-2009 11:49 Post subject: |
|
|
hey can someone explain to me in this video i cant extract the risk elements except one and i cant see liubov making in each flexibility a bonus i dont undersyand some of the handlings of the ball can someone explain me the composition cause i want to do a new composition and i cant plz
here is the video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQXk7T_mQnM&feature=related |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jana
Joined: 16 Jul 2005 Posts: 252 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Sun, 29-Mar-2009 10:32 Post subject: |
|
|
How do I write it when a gymnast bounces the ball and catch it in her hollow of the knee without hand, than drop the ball from this position to the floor so that it bounces again and bounce it with her feet? Twice as bouncing without hands (0.1/0.1)? Sorry it´s hard to describe it |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Themis
Joined: 02 Jan 2005 Posts: 370
|
Posted: Mon, 30-Mar-2009 8:01 Post subject: |
|
|
Jana I think you are right. Your second option is to write as series+without hands: 0.20 p. Which is the same value. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|