View previous topic | View next topic |
Author |
Message |
cheyenne
Joined: 19 Jan 2009 Posts: 65 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Mon, 14-Dec-2009 4:42 Post subject: |
|
|
Is this move:
"Support on the forearms arrival foreward on the knee: E 0.5" (Number 31 E)
Is that basically a walkover on the forearms, and when you come up from it, you tuck your feet under and rise up onto the knee?
And can someone explain the difference betwwen 31 E and 31 D???
Please! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tahnee RSG.net Moderator
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 3296 Location: Perth, Australia
|
Posted: Mon, 14-Dec-2009 13:02 Post subject: |
|
|
cheyenne wrote: | Is this move:
"Support on the forearms arrival foreward on the knee: E 0.5" (Number 31 E)
Is that basically a walkover on the forearms, and when you come up from it, you tuck your feet under and rise up onto the knee?
And can someone explain the difference betwwen 31 E and 31 D???
Please! |
Elbow balance to an A arch - the judges must see a fixed (but only momentarily) shape in each position.
With 31D no A arch (arch on knees) is required. The legs must also switch during the position, either vertically or around the horizontal. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/Tahnee2612 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cheyenne
Joined: 19 Jan 2009 Posts: 65 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Mon, 14-Dec-2009 20:17 Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sery
Joined: 26 Oct 2003 Posts: 497
|
Posted: Tue, 22-Dec-2009 23:59 Post subject: |
|
|
Tahnee wrote: | The legs must also switch during the position, either vertically or around the horizontal. |
or in other ways. it is free. _________________ Go Alina, you are the Olympic Champion 2008!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Svet T.
Joined: 27 Oct 2003 Posts: 285 Location: Somewhere...beyond the sea....
|
Posted: Sun, 10-Jan-2010 3:37 Post subject: |
|
|
Sery wrote: |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFr_zsq4nHY
0:43
Interesting example: She writes 0.70 for this difficulty in her form
Passing from a split to another split with rotation +0.40
but the additional swing is attitude! which must be a split or ring. |
Is this difficulty cancelled? Thank you. _________________ "Jealousy is the tribute mediocrity pays to genius."
- Fulton J. Sheen |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sery
Joined: 26 Oct 2003 Posts: 497
|
Posted: Sun, 31-Jan-2010 22:54 Post subject: |
|
|
Svet T. wrote: | Sery wrote: |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFr_zsq4nHY
0:43
Interesting example: She writes 0.70 for this difficulty in her form
Passing from a split to another split with rotation +0.40
but the additional swing is attitude! which must be a split or ring. |
Is this difficulty cancelled? Thank you. |
This is 100% wrong technique. _________________ Go Alina, you are the Olympic Champion 2008!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Iva
Joined: 31 Jan 2006 Posts: 73
|
Posted: Mon, 1-Feb-2010 4:09 Post subject: |
|
|
Sery wrote: | Svet T. wrote: | Sery wrote: |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFr_zsq4nHY
0:43
Interesting example: She writes 0.70 for this difficulty in her form
Passing from a split to another split with rotation +0.40
but the additional swing is attitude! which must be a split or ring. |
Is this difficulty cancelled? Thank you. |
This is 100% wrong technique. |
Why? in CoP it is stated that should be passing from split to another split with additional swing + rotation, but it doesn't say that swing is supposed to be a split or ring. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sery
Joined: 26 Oct 2003 Posts: 497
|
Posted: Thu, 11-Mar-2010 20:28 Post subject: |
|
|
Iva wrote: | Sery wrote: | Svet T. wrote: | Sery wrote: |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFr_zsq4nHY
0:43
Interesting example: She writes 0.70 for this difficulty in her form
Passing from a split to another split with rotation +0.40
but the additional swing is attitude! which must be a split or ring. |
Is this difficulty cancelled? Thank you. |
This is 100% wrong technique. |
Why? in CoP it is stated that should be passing from split to another split with additional swing + rotation, but it doesn't say that swing is supposed to be a split or ring. |
oh, then we can do any swings? maybe should i make a swing on just 20 degrees and get 0.10? or only on 5 degrees? how about 1 degree?
swing in those difficulties must be OR split OR boucle, this is flexibility.
Be sure that this is wrong technique - I talked on this element with CT ;P _________________ Go Alina, you are the Olympic Champion 2008!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dsafilipe
Joined: 29 Jun 2007 Posts: 392 Location: Foz do Iguaçu - Brazil
|
Posted: Mon, 29-Mar-2010 3:35 Post subject: |
|
|
....Could someone please count how many turns she does from the second 0:30 - 0:35?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TpYfq95RR6M
...Am I crasy, or she does only 4? People say it's fivee... _________________ (...) e nos teus olhos eu vejo o susto e o grão de uma lágrima sobre a qual me concentro (...)
Image from "Sarah"... Thx. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Truebluesea
Joined: 11 Nov 2009 Posts: 1436 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Mon, 29-Mar-2010 4:36 Post subject: |
|
|
4,5 turns _________________ спорт, страсть |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tahnee RSG.net Moderator
Joined: 11 Jan 2004 Posts: 3296 Location: Perth, Australia
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dsafilipe
Joined: 29 Jun 2007 Posts: 392 Location: Foz do Iguaçu - Brazil
|
Posted: Tue, 30-Mar-2010 1:40 Post subject: |
|
|
So it should have been counted as four turns? 6+2+2+2 = 1,2? _________________ (...) e nos teus olhos eu vejo o susto e o grão de uma lágrima sobre a qual me concentro (...)
Image from "Sarah"... Thx. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Truebluesea
Joined: 11 Nov 2009 Posts: 1436 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Tue, 30-Mar-2010 3:27 Post subject: |
|
|
dsafilipe wrote: | So it should have been counted as four turns? 6+2+2+2 = 1,2? |
Yes they should count only the completed turns, but she's from Russia tho, we never know _________________ спорт, страсть |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chik_ucv
Joined: 11 Feb 2004 Posts: 144
|
Posted: Thu, 1-Apr-2010 1:55 Post subject: |
|
|
Sery wrote: | Iva wrote: | Sery wrote: | Svet T. wrote: | Sery wrote: |
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFr_zsq4nHY
0:43
Interesting example: She writes 0.70 for this difficulty in her form
Passing from a split to another split with rotation +0.40
but the additional swing is attitude! which must be a split or ring. |
Is this difficulty cancelled? Thank you. |
This is 100% wrong technique. |
Why? in CoP it is stated that should be passing from split to another split with additional swing + rotation, but it doesn't say that swing is supposed to be a split or ring. |
oh, then we can do any swings? maybe should i make a swing on just 20 degrees and get 0.10? or only on 5 degrees? how about 1 degree?
swing in those difficulties must be OR split OR boucle, this is flexibility.
Be sure that this is wrong technique - I talked on this element with CT ;P |
I talked to one of the best national coaches about this last year, and he explaines to me that the ONLY difference betwen the flexibility fouettes y and the balance fouette, is the releve, you can use ANY position, even if it´s not a complete split or a ring position, so this one is perfectly fine |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ashanty
Joined: 19 Dec 2004 Posts: 282
|
Posted: Thu, 1-Apr-2010 3:07 Post subject: |
|
|
well, on flexibility fouettes you have to show the biggest amplitude you have and you don't have to do the releve, just the amplitude, with balances, you have to hold the position at least one time to see the form of the balance |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|